Change to Sites?

We are using Sites (http://cldr.unicode.org/) to host all of the CLDR development web pages. I took a look at the cldr pages, and the following are not in Sites. The question is, should we move them (or some of them) to Sites?

Advantages

• 1. Removing a bottleneck. Even though we have them in CVS (so the project people can edit the repository copies of them), we have a bottleneck in that only a small number of people (Rick, Steven, and me) can actually post them up publicly.

  2. Editing doesn't require an HTML editor.

Disadvantages

• 1. The look and feel is somewhat different than the regular Unicode site (although we should be able to make it closer over time).

Files

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/beta.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/comparison_charts.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/corrigenda.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/index.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/filing_bug_reports.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/locale_faq.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/process.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/transliteration_guidelines.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/terms.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/survey_tool.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/repository_access.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/version/ (version pages)

Here are the other files:

Special purpose, for redirecting.

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/header.html

Old or temporary page:

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/readme.txt

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/press.html

Already redirect, some to Docs pages

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/big_red_switch.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/charts.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/data_formats.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/errata.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/procedures.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/tr35.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/timezone_ids.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/survey_tool_known_bugs.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/vetting.html

http://www.unicode.org/cldr/xmlGuide.html

Possible Bug - needs investigation.